The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum

Confederate policy ignored...

AN ACT to authorize the enrollment of the Creoles of Mobile.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Alabama in General Assembly convened, what certain persons of mixed blood, residing in the city and county of Mobile, commonly known as Creoles, be, and the same are hereby, authorized to be enrolled as militia for the defense of the city and county of Mobile, if in the opinion of the mayor of the city it is expedient.

SECTION 2. Be it further enacted, That the enrollment authorized by the first section of this act shall be made as follows, to wit: The mayor shall enroll such male Creoles between the ages of eighteen years and fifty years who wish to be enrolled. He shall then divide them into suitable companies, and appoint some discreet white man as commissioned officer to command said companies. Said companies shall be confined exclusively to the defense of the city and county of Mobile, and shall be under the command of the military authorities in the city of Mobile.

Approved November 20, 1862.

Messages In This Thread

State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Confederate policy ignored...
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
Re: State Laws vs Confederate Laws
So many differences
I Thought This Was Settled...but lookee here.
State of Texas 1859 Laws