The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum

Why the Civil War was not about slavery

Buchanan Bound to Collect Revenue

Edited for length
War of the Rebellion: Serial 001 Page 0117 Chapter I. CORRESPONDENCE, ETC. – UNION.

These were the last instructions transmitted to Major Anderson before his removal to Fort Sumter, with a single exception, in regard to a particular which does not in any degree affect the present question. Under these circumstances it is clear that Major Anderson acted upon his own responsibility, and without authority, unless, indeed, he had “tangible

Page 118

evidence of a design to proceed to a hostile act” on the part of the authorities of South Carolina, which as not yet been alleged. Still, he is a brave and honorable officer, and justice requires that he should not be condemned without a fair hearing.

————–On the very day, the 27th instant, that possession of these two forts was taken the palmetto flag was raised over the Federal custom-house and post-office in Charleston; and on the same day every officer of the customs, collector, naval officer, surveyor, and appraisers, resigned their offices. And this, although it was well known from the language of my message that, as an executive officer, I felt myself bound to collect the revenue at the port of Charleston under the existing laws.

With great personal regard, I remain, yours, very respectfully,

JAMES BUCHANAN.

Messages In This Thread

Why the Civil War was not about slavery
Lincoln #1
Re: Lincoln #2
Re: Lincoln #3
Re: Lincoln #4
Re: Why the Civil War was not about slavery
Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?
Re: Where's the Du Boeuf?