The Civil War News & Views Open Discussion Forum

Re: State Sovereignty
In Response To: Re: State Sovereignty ()

"In what I have read, I have not seen "state sovereignty," per se, defined in terms of the states performing on behalf of, or in the place of the federal government - no matter how rationale and appealing that interpretation is."

The Preamble to The Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights."

(Amendments I through VIII omitted for this rply. Stan)

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

It seems to me that the purposes of the IXth and Xth Amendments were not to allow states to act in place of the Federal Government, but to restrict the actions of the Federal Government to those specificslly granted to it by the Constitution. All other rights and powers not denied the states specifically were held, or kept by the states, or the people. The government has run roughshod over these rights and has been upheld by the various courts, all in the quest for POWER. Vote the rascals out, and God save the current Supreme Court for at least four more years. Stan

Messages In This Thread

State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty
Re: State Sovereignty